Cases 71 - 80 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Del Villar-Rosario v. Popular Bank, Inc., et al
as 12-2475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EURIPIDES DEL VILLAR-ROSARIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, JORGE EDUARDO MARTINEZ-LANDRON, RICHARD L. CARRION and others
Del Villar-Rosario v. Popular Bank, Inc., et al
as 12-2252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EURIPIDES DEL VILLAR-ROSARIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, JORGE EDUARDO MARTINEZ-LANDRON, RICHARD L. CARRION and others
US v. Cruz-Medina
as 12-2181
Defendant:
LUIS CRUZ-MEDINA
:
UNITED STATES
Movant - Appellant:
EDWIN EDGARDO LEON-LEON
Medina v. Roden
as 12-2094
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUIS MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY RODEN, Superintendent of MCI Norfolk
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
College of Dental Surgeons, et al v. Triple S Management, Inc., et al
as 12-1782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF PUERTO RICO, on its own behalf and in representation of its members, THOMAS MANUEL MEDINA, NOEL AYMAT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TRIPLE S MANAGEMENT, INC., TRIPLE S, INC., TRIPLE C, INC. and others
Defendant:
ASOCIACION DE COMPANIAS DE SEGUROS DE PUERTO RICO, INC.
US v. Pizarro
as 12-1759
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS PIZARRO, a/k/a Wee
Interested Party:
ISRAEL PEREZ-DELGADO, HECTOR MARTINEZ-MEDINA, SONIA PEREZ-HAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-9005
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Correy
as 12-1542
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CORREY, a/k/a Earth
Interested Party:
ISRAEL PEREZ-DELGADO, HECTOR MARTINEZ-MEDINA, SONIA PEREZ-HAND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
