Cases 1 - 10 of 23,402
US v. Hernandez-Vega
as 24-1732
Interested Party:
JORGE RODRIGUEZ and ALMA ENID MARTINEZ
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CARLOS L. HERNANDEZ-VEGA, a/k/a Carlos Peca
US v. McCarthy, et al
as 24-1743
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
STEPS TO SOLUTIONS, INC. and PETER MCCARTHY
Thomas v. Luna, et al
as 24-1730
Defendant:
FNU MARTINEZ, Assistant Warden of Operations, FNU SHULER, Case Manger for A-1, Team Rome, Designation & Sentence Computation Center, Grand Prairie, Texas, FNU SCHERIBER, Assistant Warden of Programs and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. THOMAS
Bone v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1703
Defendant:
ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, NORFOLK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
ELSTON BONE
Shabshelowitz v. Rhode Island Department of Public Safety, et al
as 24-1714
Defendant:
LT. MICHAEL CASEY, individually and in his official capacity as an officer of Rhode Island State Police, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and RHODE ISLAND STATE POLICE
Plaintiff:
HARLAN SHABSHELOWITZ
Harmony Healthcare International, Inc. v. Samaritan Senior Village, Inc., et al
as 24-1719
Plaintiff:
HARMONY HEALTHCARE INTERNATIONAL, INC., as successor in interest to Harmony Healthcare International, Inc.
Defendant:
SAMARITAN SENIOR VILLAGE, INC., d/b/a Samaritan Summit Village and SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., d/b/a Samaritan Keep Nursing Home
Orkin v. Boost Web SEO, Inc.
as 24-1734
Cross-Plaintiff:
BOOST WEB SEO, INC.
Interested Party:
CARDCONNECT, LLC
Defendant:
LISA SUE ALBERT and IAN ALBERT
Plaintiff:
WAYNE ORKIN and ARTHUR ORKIN
US v. Reardon
as 24-1724
Interested Party:
US SMALL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION and TD BANKNORTH, N. A.
Defendant:
NATHAN REARDON
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Calderon Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-1740
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
VICTOR ENRIQUE CALDERON RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
