Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Capen, et al v. Campbell
as 24-1061
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. CAPEN and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
Defendant:
ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
BRADY, MARCH FOR OUR LIVES, GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner:
ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff:
IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant:
DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
