Cases 1 - 10 of 11
In Re: Da Graca, et al
as 20-2117
Interested Party:
OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner:
JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent:
THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party:
JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
In Re: Mortgage Foreclosure
as 12-1563
Petitioner:
VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC., SAND CANYON CORPORATION, f/k/a Option One Mortgage Corporation, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
:
and
Respondent:
TERESA TRACY, CARLOS BAPTISTA, LLOYD A. OGILVIE and others
In Re: Mortgage Foreclosure
as 12-1526
Petitioner:
VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC., SAND CANYON CORPORATION, f/k/a Option One Mortgage Corporation, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
:
and
Respondent:
TERESA TRACY, CARLOS BAPTISTA, LLOYD A. OGILVIE and others
Hughes-Birch, et al v. Honorable McCauley Manzi, et al
as 10-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACEY HUGHES-BIRCH
Plaintiff:
LILY HUGHES-BIRCH and LEAH KEFFERSTAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY MCCAULEY MANZI, JOHN P. CRONIN, RICHARD NARDELLA and others
Fici, et al v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., et al
as 08-2323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL FICI PAUL FICI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED and ANTHONY P. BOREMI ANTHONY P. BOREMI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F ARIVELLA, LUCIEN F CARRIER, ELNORA M CURRAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES PENSION PLAN, LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN and others
Defendant:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA (CWA), LOCAL UNION 1365, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 1366 and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
