Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
SABRINA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, JUDGE THERESA A. BISENIUS, JUDGE JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ARBOGAST and BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Gustavsen, et al v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 17-2066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GUSTAVSEN, JOSEPH CUGINI, DEMETRA COHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH LTD., FALCON PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN TORT REFORM ASSOCIATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS and others
US, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 16-1805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. ALEX BOOKER and EDMUND HEBRON, ALEX BOOKER, ex rel. UNITED STATES, STATES OF CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA and WI, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and EDMUND HEBRON, ex rel. UNITED STATES, STATES OF CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA and WI, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER, INC.
Painters and Allied Trades v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 16-8024
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 82 HEATH CARE FUND
Plaintiff:
MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532), PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532), JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532) and others
Defendant - Respondent:
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
WARNER-LAMBERT CO. and PFIZER, INC.
Interested Party:
NATALIE LUSTER
Luster v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 14-2070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
NATALIE LUSTER
Plaintiff:
TARA JOHNDROW, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRIAN ANSON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SCOTT A. WILCOX, on behalf of himself & all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC., FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Jaeckel, et al v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 14-8004
Plaintiff:
JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, ANNA MURRET, UNIVERSAL CARE, INC. and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ANGELA JAECKEL, MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Defendant - Petitioner:
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Interested Party:
NATALIE LUSTER
Wilcox v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 13-8008
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SCOTT A. WILCOX
Plaintiff:
MARTHA PALUMBO, PETER PALUMBO, JAYNE EHRLICH and others
Defendant - Respondent:
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Bartlett v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 12-1429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP BARTLETT
Plaintiff:
NATALIE BARTLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
