Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kifor v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1075
Plaintiff:
IMRE KIFOR
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, MIDDLESEX PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT and others
Cline v. Burke, et al
as 23-1680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRON CLINE
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK K. BURKE, ANDREA LEVY, FREDERICK RUSHTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Solomon v. Frederickson, et al
as 22-1956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS J. SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK FREDERICKSON, in his personal capacity and official capacity, PHILIP MAGNUSON, in his personal capacity and official capacity, MICHAEL KENNEFICK, in his personal capacity and official capacity and others
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LAWLESS, NATASHA C. LISMAN, DOUGLAS WOLF and others
Solomon v. Frederickson, et al
as 22-1426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS J. SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT C. LAWLESS, NATASHA C. LISMAN, DOUGLAS WOLF and others
Defendant:
CATHOLIC CHURCH OF AMERICA, ST JUDE/ALSAC, VINCENT LECLERC and others
Emrit v. National Football League, et al
as 20-1079
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, DANIEL SNYDER and WASHINGTON REDSKINS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Snyder v. Essex County Probation
as 20-1019
Respondent / Appellee:
ESSEX COUNTY PROBATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOANNA M. SNYDER
L., et al v. Baker, et al
as 19-1126
Defendant / Appellee:
MARYLOU SUDDERS, KAREN E. SPILKA, RALPH D. GANTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UELOT L., CHLOE L., KATIE L. and others
Defendant:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI
Plaintiff:
FABRIZIA L.
Snyder v. SMCC, et al
as 19-1013
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNN BISSONNETTE, Superintendent - MCI Framingham, UNKNOWN OFFICER, with initials D.D., PETER RICE, Inner Perimeter Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOANNA M. SNYDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
