Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Agustin v. Rosen, et al
as 20-2108
Respondent: CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Security, Department of Homeland Security, KRISTEN SMITH, Field Office Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, MARK KOUMANS, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner: ELEAZAR JOEL SANDOVAL AGUSTIN
Respondent / Appellee: JEFFREY ROSEN, U.S. Attorney General and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Kinuthia v. Barr, et al
as 19-1858
Petitioner / Appellant: NAOMI WAHU KINUTHIA
Respondent / Appellee: TODD M. LYONS, U.S. ICE-Immigration Custom Enforcement Field Office, acting Director Boston Field Office, WILLIAM P. BARR, DONNA CARR and others
Barbour v. Holder
as 12-1510
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his individual and official capacities as U.S. Attorney General
Barbour v. Holder
as 11-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENT BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacities
Barbour v. Holder
as 11-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENT BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacities
Barbour v. Holder
as 11-2058
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENT BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1731
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Velazquez-Linares v. United States Government, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1548
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARIA VELAZQUEZ-LINARES
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES, Government, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?