Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Alvarado-Hernandez, et al v. Garland
as 24-1447
Petitioner:
MAIDELIN NOEMI ALVARADO-HERNANDEZ, JOSE ZALDIVAR-VASQUEZ and H.C.S.A.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Vasquez-Landaver
as 24-1010
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GUILLERMO VASQUEZ-LANDAVER, a/k/a Jute
In Re:Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1088
Petitioner:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Respondent:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Interested Party:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, and 36 other Higher Education Organizations, MICHAEL P. KEANE and others
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., et al v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Defendant:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SARAH COLE, NEW ENGLAND FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
US v. Vasquez-Rodrigue
as 23-1035
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
DANYBELKIS VASQUEZ-RODRIGUE, a/k/a Dany
Lu v. Budd, et al
as 21-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN LAFRAZIA, SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE, INC., KIMBERLY SUZANNE BUDD and others
Peguero-Vasquez v. Garland
as 21-1473
Petitioner:
VICTOR PEGUERO-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
In Re: Da Graca, et al
as 20-2117
Interested Party:
OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner:
JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent:
THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
