Cases 11 - 20 of 32,695
Yaghoobi v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 1:2024cv11345
Plaintiff:
Vesal Yaghoobi
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RDC Liquidating Trust v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al
as 1:2024cv11320
Plaintiff:
RDC LIQUIDATING TRUST
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
EASY PAY SOLUTIONS INC v. TURNER
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
EASY PAY SOLUTIONS INC
Defendant:
JAMES TURNER doing business as COACTIVE PARTNERS
Counter Claimant:
JAMES TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Quindi-Quizhpilema, et al v. Garland
as 24-1466
Petitioner:
BLANCA JANNETH QUINDI-QUIZHPILEMA and E. M.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Almeida v. Taxiarchos et al
as 1:2024cv10704
Plaintiff:
Ana Almeida
Defendant:
John Taxiarchos, Rose Renee Fernandes, City of New Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Ortiz v. NewRez LLC
as 24-1463
Plaintiff:
DIOMEDES ORTIZ
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Value Drug Company v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv11312
Plaintiff:
VALUE DRUG COMPANY
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
