Cases 41 - 50 of 258
Does, et al v. Mills, et al
as 21-1826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOES, 1-3, JACK DOES, 1-1000, JANE DOES, 1-6 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine, JEANNE LAMBREW, NIRAV D. SHAH, in his official capacity as Director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Petitioner:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLOBAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE and METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCHES
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. State of Texas
as 21-1777
Plaintiff:
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
STATE OF TEXAS, LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Cardona, et al
as 21-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, ANNE DOE, EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO and others
US v. Cardozo
as 21-1779
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BYRON ALLAN CARDOZO
Interested Party:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3 and others
Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation, et al v. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, et al
as 21-1773
Plaintiff:
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER, SPEECH FIRST, INC. and others
Jones v. Carter Business Service Inc et al
as 1:2021cv11589
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Carter Business Service Inc, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Doe et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv11571
Plaintiff:
Mary Doe, Nancy Doe, Doe Jane and others
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Alejandro Mayorkas, Troy Miller, William A. Ferrara and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Santiago-Martinez, et al v. Fundacion Damas, Inc.
as 21-1718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YANIRA SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ, in representation of minor J.R.S. and RAYMOND RAMIREZ-CARABALLO, in representation of minor J.R.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
FUNDACION DAMAS, INC., d/b/a Hospital Damas, Inc., JORGE MARTINEZ-COLON, and his wife Jane Doe, in representation of their Conjugal Partnership and NORMA SOTO, in representation of their Conjugal Partnership
Defendant:
HOSPITAL DAMAS, INC., or, alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital Damas, JORGE MARTINEZ-COLON, in representation of his Conjugal Partnership and NORMA SOTO, in representation of her Conjugal Partnership
Gonzalez-Arroyo v. Doctors' Center Hospital Bayamon, Inc., et al
as 21-1689
Interested Party:
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID EFRON, P.C.
Plaintiff:
JAMILET GONZALEZ-ARROYO, in representation of her minor son ALG
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTORS' CENTER HOSPITAL BAYAMON, INC., DR. BENITO HERNANDEZ-DIAZ and JANE DOE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN INSURANCE COMPANIES A THROUGH H
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
