Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Williams v. Mass. College of Pharmacy, et al
as 14-1568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES, JACKSON LEWIS LLP, SCOTT L. MASSEY and others
Defendant:
L&E GLOBAL and STEPHAN SWINKELS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shuper v. Chandler, et al
as 13-2386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLA IOSIFOVNA SHUPER
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA CHANDLER, PETER LEWIS and JOHN DESJARDINS
Defendant:
BILL KUHL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cabot v. Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv11903
Plaintiff:
Jason Cabot
Defendant:
William Lewis and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Shuper v. Chandler, et al
as 13-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLA IOSIFOVNA SHUPER
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA CHANDLER, PETER LEWIS, BILL KUHL and others
Shuper v. Chandler, et al
as 13-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLA IOSIFOVNA SHUPER
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA CHANDLER, PETER LEWIS, BILL KUHL and others
Shuper v. Chandler, et al
as 13-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLA IOSIFOVNA SHUPER
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA CHANDLER, PETER LEWIS, JOHN DESJARDINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
