Cases 91 - 100 of 16,268
Houston v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3529
Petitioner:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Aparicio v. City of San Diego, California et al
as 3:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Hilarino Aparicio
Defendant:
City of San Diego, California, David Nisleit, Mathew Ruggiero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Houston v. Implus Footcare, LLC
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
Telfair W. Houston
Defendant:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1175
Petitioner:
Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics, Clean Air Council and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Alexander v. Chime
as 3:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Chime
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Matthew Peterson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 24-1585
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PETERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART, DARRYL HOUSTON, HUGH WALSH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zone Mechanical North LLC v. Ruther et al
as 5:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Zone Mechanical North LLC
Defendant:
Alex Ruther and Alex Ruther doing business as Jackbe Inc
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463 Public Contracts: Unlawful Employment Prac
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
