Cases 1 - 7 of 7
City of Providence, RI, et al v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, et al
as 15-1250
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Liti, et al, et al
as 14-2071
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself andall others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10440
Plaintiff:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv02475
Plaintiff:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company, Warner Chilcott Company Inc., Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013md02472
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite-Aid Corporation and others
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd., Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Health Care Service Corporation, Caremark, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fratenal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv10425
Plaintiff:
Fratenal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals , Warner-Lambert Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
