Cases 11 - 20 of 936
Jensen v. Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Justyna Jensen
Defendant:
Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and Kimberly Ahern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acosta v. Providence Police Department
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Robert Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Providence Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brum v. Town of Bristol et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Brum
Defendant:
Town of Bristol, Bristol Police Department, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolon v. Fudge
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Angel Rolon
Defendant:
Marcia Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disability Rights Rhode Island v. Medeiros
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Rhode Island
Defendant:
Katelyn Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cofield v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Defendant:
PNC Bank, U.S. Postal Service, N.Y. E.B.T. and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Cofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Northup v. Reilly et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Northup
Defendant:
William Reilly and Andrew Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kyros v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dr. William M. Kyros, MD and Dr. William M. Kyros, M.D.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, James A Diossa, Rhode Island Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Fantel, Jr. v. FBI et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
FBI, Caitlin Isherwood and Mark Trovato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
