Cases 71 - 80 of 172
Supreme v. City of Concord, NH et al
as 1:2017cv00670
Defendant:
Eugene Blake, Concord, NH, City of, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Vermin Love Supreme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brodeur v. MA, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00445
Defendant:
Charlie Baker, John Does 1&2, MA, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brodeur
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Halabi v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40127
Plaintiff:
Hatem Halabi
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Officer, John Doe #1 and Officer, John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kargbo v. Haverhill District Court et al
as 1:2017cv11446
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Kargbo
Defendant:
Haverhill District Court, Essex County Sheriff Office, Nashua Street Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40103
Plaintiff:
Carl S. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Carl Supernor, Terrence Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Skrabec, et al v. Town of North Attleboro, et al
as 17-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK SKRABEC, NEIL SKRABEC and MARY ANN SKRABEC
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH ATTLEBORO, MA, DANIEL ARRIGHI, JOSHUA MCMAHON and others
Lech v. Von Goeler et al
as 3:2017cv30024
Plaintiff:
Lidia Lech
Defendant:
Dorothea Von Goeler , Baystate Medical Center, Inc. , Hampden County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clemens v. Doe, et al
as 17-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY L. CLEMENS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and JANE DOE
Clemens v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2017cv10044
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Clemens
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz-Castro et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2016cv02873
Plaintiff:
Maria Judith Diaz-Castro and W.C.D.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico , Juan J. Colon-Baez, Mario Rivera-Giegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
