Cases 101 - 110 of 5,243
Celester v. Rodrigues
as 23-1973
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE CELESTER
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL RODRIGUES and MICHAEL RODRIGUES, Superintendent of MCI Shirley
Larson v. Napier
as 1:2023cv12817
Petitioner:
Thomas Larson
Respondent:
Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bedini v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Tony Bedini
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cedeno-Lora v. FMC Warden
as 1:2023cv12800
Petitioner:
Victor Cedeno-Lora
Respondent:
FMC Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibarra-Gonzalez v. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico
as 3:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Moises Ibarra-Gonzalez
Defendant:
El Pueblo de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winkleman v. Hazlewood
as 23-1942
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN F. WINKLEMAN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Truc v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Tran Truc
Defendant:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Etienne v. Edmark
as 23-1946
Petitioner / Appellant:
DICKENS ETIENNE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, NH State Prison
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00509
Petitioner:
Everett Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brodeur v. NH, State of
as 1:2023cv00505
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
NH, State of
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
