Cases 41 - 50 of 211
Burnham v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2016cv40156
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Burnham
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Maura Healey, Dennis P McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2016cv12237
Plaintiff:
Richard Carl Vega
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 1:2016cv11666
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Bennett, Department of Correction, Executive Office of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Hill
as 1:2016cv10978
Plaintiff:
Scott Hill
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornwell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2016cv10948
Plaintiff:
Brian Cornwell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Plymouth District Court, Plymouth County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horan et al v. Cabral et al
as 1:2016cv10359
Defendant:
Andrea J. Cabral, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Suffolk County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
John Horan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, Jr. v. Mohan, et al
as 16-1068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUY L. SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ASSISTANT D.A. JASON MOHAN, RICHARD PORRO, OFFICER WALSH and others
Mederos v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2015cv13623
Plaintiff:
Antonio Mederos
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bruyette v. Wall
as 15-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. BRUYETTE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER IANNELLA, Governor's Counsel, GOVERNOR DEVAL L. PATRICK, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSH WALL, Chairman Commonwealth of Massachusetts Parole Board
Cassidy v. Healey et al
as 1:2015cv12932
Plaintiff:
John Cassidy
Defendant:
Maura Healey and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
