Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carleton v. Bearce, et al
as 23-1327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN T. CARLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC BEARCE, ALAN WINTLE, MARIE LANDRY and others
Cintron v. Bibeault, et al
as 22-1716
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY CINTRON
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL BIBEAULT, In his Official and Individual Capacity, RUI DINIZ, in his official and individual capacity, MATTHEW KETTLE, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
LT. HAYES, in his official and individual capacity, LT. MOE, in his official and individual capacity, LT. BUSH, in his official and individual capacity and others
CARLETON v. BEARCE et al
as 1:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
RYAN T CARLETON
Defendant:
CO ERIC BEARCE, C/O WINTLE, JA MARIE LANDRY and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neves v. Bibeault et al
as 1:2019cv00514
Defendant:
Paul Bibeault, "Counselor" Franco, Deputy Warden Rui Diniz and others
Plaintiff:
Davante Neves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cintron v. Bibeault et al
as 1:2019cv00497
Defendant:
Paul Bibeault, Special Investigator Cabral, Jennifer Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinones-Mercado v. E.U. et al
as 3:2008cv02230
Plaintiff:
German Jr. Quinones-Mercado
Defendant:
E.U., George W. Bush, E.L.A. de P.R. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter, et al v. Dubois, et al
as 08-2150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN CARTER
Plaintiff:
RAUL CASANOVA, DEMOND HICKS, KEVIN BUSH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD DUVAL, STEVEN AYALA, WILLIAM J. GROSSI and others
Defendant:
LARRY E. DUBOIS, DANIEL J. SULLIVAN, EDWARD KLOS and others
Williams v. United States Federal Government et al
as 1:2007cv11888
Plaintiff:
George Charles Williams
Defendant:
United States Federal Government, Executive Office of the President, The White House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
