Cases 31 - 40 of 335
Van Veenendaal v. Optic Power, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01078
Plaintiff:
Matthew Van Veenendaal
Defendant:
Optic Power, LLC, Matthew Sopiars, Aaron Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Falcone v. Durham School Services, L.P.
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Karen Falcone
Defendant:
Durham School Services, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Chenier v. R.H. White Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv40156
Plaintiff:
Korey Chenier
Defendant:
R.H. White Construction Co., Inc., R.H. White Companies, Inc., L.H. White & Son, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Walker v. Rent Sons, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Julia Walker
Defendant:
Rent Sons, Inc. doing business as Surv and Patrick Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doe v. Massachusetts Teachers Association
as 1:2022cv11982
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Massachusetts Teachers Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Rousseau v. Clark University et al
as 4:2022cv40118
Plaintiff:
Randi Rousseau
Defendant:
Clark University and Laura A Robinson
Barillas v. Metropolitan Linen Services, Corp
as 1:2022cv11615
Plaintiff:
Mirta Barillas
Defendant:
Metropolitan Linen Services, Corp
Haley v. Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational Technical High School et al
as 1:2022cv11518
Plaintiff:
Ana Haley
Defendant:
Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational Technical High School, James L O'Brien and Michael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Palumbo v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Scott D. Palumbo
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ryder v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
as 1:2022cv11337
Plaintiff:
Toney Ryder
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
