Cases 21 - 30 of 332
Harley v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10796
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stephen T Harley
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Vazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01160
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Vazquez and Carlos L. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hernandez-Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01106
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Maria Hernandez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Devine v Saul
as 1:2021cv10129
Plaintiff:
Zachary Devine
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burgos-Fonseca v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01027
Plaintiff:
Wigberto Burgos-Fonseca
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pastrana-Marcano v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01660
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mayra Ivette Pastrana-Marcano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rivera-Quiles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01551
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Emma I Rivera-Quiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ramaella v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30162
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jessica Mercy Ramaella
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01519
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Vicente Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ELLIOTT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2020cv00335
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KEAKO MARIE ELLIOTT
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
