Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Adamo, et al v. Genzyme Corporation
as 15-1447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP ADAMO, JAMES BEADNELL, JOY BEADNELL and others
Defendant:
MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
GENZYME CORPORATION
Charlette v. Tai-O Associates, LP et al
as 1:2014cv13249
Plaintiff:
Adam Charlette
Defendant:
Tai-O Associates, LP, Tai-O General Partner, Inc, Tai-O Limited Partner, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Charlette v. Tai-O Associates, LP et al
as 4:2014cv13249
Plaintiff:
Adam Charlette
Defendant:
Tai-O Associates, LP, Tai-O General Partner, Inc, Tai-O Limited Partner, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christensen et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2014cv10100
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Christensen , Jeffrey Scolnick and William Farrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. 29 Prime, Inc.
as 1:2013cv12814
Plaintiff:
Adam Russell
Defendant:
29 Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Alberts et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2013cv12250
Plaintiff:
Erin Alberts , Timothy Alberts , Adam Christensen and others
Defendant:
CVS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. MACK et al
as 2:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
ADAM MACK and CHARTWELL MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Adamo, et al. v. Genzyme Corporation, et al.
as 1:2013cv11336
Plaintiff:
Philip Adamo , James Beadnell , Joy Beadnell and others
Defendant:
Genzyme Corporation and Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vidoni v. Acadia
as 12-1549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM VIDONI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ACADIA
United States, ex rel., Witkin, et al. v. Medtronic, Inc., et al.
as 1:2011cv10790
Plaintiff:
Adam Witkin , State of Virginia, Doe States 1-23 and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Minimed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
