Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff: CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner: FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERSANT POWER et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER and ENMAX CORPORATION
Defendant: WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Petitioner: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Geigel v. Electric Power Authority
as 3:2019cv01154
Plaintiff: Carlos E. Geigel
Defendant: Electric Power Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ocean State Power, LLC v. Town of Burrillville
as 15-2041
Plaintiff - Appellant: OCEAN STATE POWER LLC
Defendant - Appellee: BURRILLVILLE, RI, by and through its Finance Director John P. Mainville
Defendant: PETER F. KILMARTIN, in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Franklin California Tax-Free, et al v. Acosta-Febo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1271
Plaintiff - Appellee: FRANKLIN CALIFORNIA TAX-FREE TRUST, FRANKLIN NEW YORK TAX-FREE TRUST, FRANKLIN TAX-FREE TRUST and others
Defendant - Appellant: MELBA ACOSTA-FEBO, as Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico Agent
Defendant: PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY (PREPA), COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and ALEJANDRO GARCIA-PADILLA, as Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Franklin California Tax-Free, et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1218
Plaintiff - Appellee: FRANKLIN CALIFORNIA TAX-FREE TRUST, FRANKLIN NEW YORK TAX-FREE TRUST, FRANKLIN TAX-FREE TRUST and others
Defendant - Appellant: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and ALEJANDRO GARCIA-PADILLA, as Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant: PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY (PREPA) and MELBA ACOSTA-FEBO, as Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico Agent
Ocean State Power LLC v. Town of Burrillville We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00046
Plaintiff: Ocean State Power LLC
Defendant: Town of Burrillville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01518
Plaintiff: Franklin California Tax-Free Trust , Franklin New York Tax-Free Trust , Franklin Tax-Free Trust and others
Defendant: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico , Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority , Alejandro Garcia-Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd. v. Bowles et al
as 4:2010cv40070
Plaintiff: TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd.
Defendant: Ian A Bowles, Philip Giudice, Paul J. Hibbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?