Cases 11 - 20 of 192
Garavanian et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 1:2023cv10678
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Garavanian, Katherine R. Arcell, Jose M. Brito and others
Defendant:
Jet Blue Airways Corporation and Spirit Airlines Inc
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Brown v. Delmonte
as 1:2023cv10580
Plaintiff:
Laurence Brown
Defendant:
Christopher Delmonte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blevins v. Portis et al
as 1:2023cv10561
Plaintiff:
Sarina Blevins
Defendant:
Tanasia Portis and Helen A Brown Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COZY, INC. v. DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC.
as 1:2023mc91137
Petitioner:
Cozy, Inc. and TRAVIS BROWN
Respondent:
Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
In Re:Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1088
Petitioner:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Respondent:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Interested Party:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, and 36 other Higher Education Organizations, MICHAEL P. KEANE and others
Cellco Partnership v. Town of Acushnet, Massachusetts
as 1:2022cv11789
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Defendant:
Town of Acushnet, Massachusetts, Paul Hipolito, Robert Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Laccinole v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau et al
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Jack Warren Brown, III and Marie S. Areskog
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brown v. CMD, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10055
Plaintiff:
d/b/a Andrew Philip Brown
Defendant:
CMD, LLC, Ryan Scott Wildrick, II, Ryan Anthony Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
