Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Victim Rights Law Center et al v. DeVos et al
as 1:2020cv11104
Defendant:
Elizabeth D. DeVos, U.S. Department of Education, Kenneth L. Marcus and others
Plaintiff:
Legal Voice, Victim Rights Law Center, Equal Rights Advocates and others
Amicus Curiae:
National LGBTQ Task Force, Vera House, Inc., California Women's Law Center and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Independent Women's Law Center, Speech First, Inc., Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Hodge
as 20-1418
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS HODGE
In re iRobot Corporation Securities Litigaiton
as 1:2019cv12536
Plaintiff:
Miramar Firefighters Pension Fund
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle and Alison Dean
Petitioner:
Richard W Masucci, Monica Sagal, min zhao and others
Campbell v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv12483
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle and Alison Dean
Plaintiff:
Jerome Campbell
Petitioner:
Richard W Masucci, Monica Sagal, min zhao and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j
Lestage v. Coloplast, Corp.
as 19-2037
Defendant:
COLOPLAST A/S, CCS MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC., BYRAM MEDICAL SUPPLIES and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROSEFF, KIMBERLY HERMAN, UNITED STATES, ex rel. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMY LESTAGE
Interested Party:
KENNY NACHWALTER, PA and PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
COLOPLAST, CORP.
Sampedro et al v. California Nightclub, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11446
Plaintiff:
Ursula Sanchez, Ursula Mayes, Joanna Krupa and others
Defendant:
California Nightclub, Inc. and Yoel Herrera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee:
US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party:
DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Union of Concerned Scientists, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1383
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE, MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS and ELIZABETH ANN SHEPPARD
Costa v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 1:2018cv11523
Plaintiff:
Krista Costa, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Krista Costa
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc., a California corporation and Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
