Cases 71 - 80 of 331
DOUGLAS et al v. LALUMIERE et al
as 2:2020cv00227
Defendant:
DAVID CLARKE, ANDRE BELLUCCI, BLR CAPITAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL DOUGLAS, JAMES LEWIS and STEVEN FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Fagre v. Parks
as 20-1343
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT SCOTT W. IRELAND, CHIEF MARK BROWN, MARK BROWN, Chief of Police and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER JEFFREY PARKS and JEFFREY PARKS, Trooper
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA FARGE, as personal representative of the Estate of Ambroshia E. Farge and JESSICA FAGRE, as personal representative of the Estate of Ambroshia E. Fagre
John R Wade et al vs. Tri -Wire Employee Stock Option Trust et al
as 1:2020cv10523
Defendant:
Tri -Wire Employee Stock Option Trust, ROBERT LANDRY, ROBERT R. NEWELL and others
Plaintiff:
John R Wade, Taylor Wade, Sharon Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jones v. Mitchell, et al
as 20-1195
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DOUGLAS L. BOWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD T. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA A. MITCHELL, MICHAEL DEVINE, JOHN F. CAMELO and others
Matalon v. Hynnes, et al
as 15-1372
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT MATALON
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH HYNNES and MARY ANN O'NEIL
US v. Granite
as 19-1185
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
LACHLAN OLEN GRANITE, a/k/a Scott Edward Bounds
DeBarros v. Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, et al
as 20-1215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELSON M. DEBARROS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELSPETH B. CYPHER, in her official capacity as Associate Justice of SJC, RALPH D. GANTS, in his official capacity as Chief Justice of SJC, KIMBERLY SUZANNE BUDD, in her official capacity as Associate Justice of SJC and others
In Re: Wedington
as 20-1225
Petitioner / Appellant:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Scott v. Synchrony Bank
as 1:2020cv10158
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Plaintiff:
Alan Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
