Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Conille, et al v. AFSCME, Council 93, et al
as 20-1926
Plaintiff / Appellee: JACQUES LARAQUE, MARIE AVELINE FORTUNAT, JEAN LOUIS and others
Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES and AFSCME, COUNCIL 93
United Food & Comm. Workers, et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND and LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Plaintiff: AFSCME HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MINNESOTA LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, NOVARTIS CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG
United Food & Comm. Workers, et al v. Novartis Pharm., et al
as 17-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, AFSCME HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., NOVARTIS CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG
Amicus Curiae: OPEN MARKETS INSTITUTE
All further filings must only be made in the CM/ECF system of the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of PR, Case No. 17-BK-3566(LTS)
as 3:2017cv01685
Undetermined: Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund, Inc., Puerto Rico Investors Tax-Free Fund V, Inc., Puerto Rico Mortgage-Backed & U.S. Government Securities Fund, Inc and others
Plaintiff: Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico
Debtor: The Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
The Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico-
as 3:2017cv01578
Plaintiff: The Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico and Trinity Services, I, LLC
Creditor: Ad Hoc Retiree Committee , American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) , CMA Architects & Engineers LLC and others
Trustee: U.S. Trustee Office and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
AFSCME Health and Welfare Fund v. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv13724
Plaintiff: AFSCME Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Novartis AG and Novartis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Harden Manufacturing Co., et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 11-1806
Plaintiff: PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL, GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ASEA/AFSCME LOCAL 52 HEALTH BENEFITS TRUST, LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY, d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and HARDEN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Petitioner: RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Defendant / Appellee: WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Not Classified By Court: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: SUSAN DUDLEY, MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC. and others
New England Carpenters Health Benefits Fund et al v. McKesson Corporation
as 1:2007cv12277
Plaintiff: New England Carpenters Health Benefits Fund, New England Carpenters Health Benefits Fund, Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust and others
Defendant: McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?