Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Duarte Cabrera v. Garland
as 24-1352
Petitioner: RAFAEL DUARTE CABRERA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Duarte De Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1057
Petitioner: KATHYA ROXANA DUARTE DE MARTINEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
In Re: Da Graca, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2117
Interested Party: OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner: JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent: THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Duart v. Mici, et al
as 20-1558
Interested Party: DAVID BAXTER, SEAN MILLIKEN, JOHN TOBIA and others
Defendant / Appellee: CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction, in Her Official and Individual Capacities, DAVID DUARTE, Superintendent of the Massachusetts Treatment Center, in His Official Capacity Only and LISA A. MITCHELL, Former Superintendent of the Massachusetts Treatment Center, in Her Individual Capacity Only
Plaintiff: JOSEPH C. BOEGGEMAN, MUHAMMAD MAHDI, DEREK GAUGHAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER DUART
Duarte v. Barr
as 19-2115
Petitioner: CLAUDIO DUARTE
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Rodriguez-Duarte v. Barr
as 19-1740
Petitioner: HUMBERTO NOEL RODRIGUEZ-DUARTE
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Duarte et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv40002
Plaintiff: J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant: Danilo E Duarte, Javier Sanchez and Danana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?