Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11311
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence, Chad F. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner:
ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff:
IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant:
DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
McGuire v. Millennium Laboratories of Cal, et al
as 17-1106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK MCGUIRE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN UEHLING, ex rel, JOHN DOE, ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
WENDY JOHNSON, ex rel, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant:
HOWARD APPEL, JAMES SLATTERY, MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. and others
United States of America et al v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc91372
Plaintiff:
United States of America, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc. and CIGNA Corporation
Nargol, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 16-1442
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Click4Support, LLC et al
as 1:2015mc91368
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, State of Connecticut and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Click4Support, LLC, iSourceUSA, LLC, Innovazion, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Patricia M. Hamill
Winkelman, et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al
as 15-1991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MYRON WINKELMAN, Ex Rel, STEPHANI LEFLORE, Ex Rel and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, CAREMARK RX, INC., CAREMARK PCS LLC and others
Garcia, et al v. Novartis, AG, et al
as 15-1470
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Allison Kelly, Frank Garcia, Stephen Fauci, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLISON KELLY, ex rel United States and FRANK GARCIA, ex rel United States
Defendant:
NOVARTIS AG and ROCHE GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, ROCHE HOLDINGS INC, GENENTECH, INC. and others
Estate of Robert Cunningham v. Millennium Laboratories of Cal
as 14-1911
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel Robert Cunningham, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ex rel and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
