Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hurtado v. Pension Benefit Information, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12473
Plaintiff:
Robbie Hurtado
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC, BerwynGroup, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation
Interested Party:
Steve Landi, Richard E. Hurley and Nila Hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Hurley v. McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States
as 3:2022cv10351
Plaintiff:
Robyn Hurley
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hurley v. McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States
as 1:2022cv10351
Plaintiff:
Robyn Hurley
Defendant:
Mckinsey & Company, Inc., United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hurley v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00849
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovasucular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation, et al. and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sondra Hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hurley et al v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv12280
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hurley and G.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hurley v. Hertz et al
as 1:2018cv12545
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hurley
Defendant:
Hertz, Mrs Felicia Houston, Thrifty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH R. LISTER
Defendant:
FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, BARRY J. CADDEN and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant:
FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, GDC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Norris, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOCELYN KAE NORRIS
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant:
LINDA LUI LUONG, FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Hurley v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12615
Plaintiff:
Susan Hurley
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
