Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lovell v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10206
Defendant:
Covidien, LLC doing business as Covidien, LP formerly known as Tyco Healthcare Group LP, United States Surgical Corp., Covidien, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Lovell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States, ex rel. Lovell & Mckusick, et al v. Athenahealth, Inc.
as 22-1245
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES, Ex. Rel Cheryl Lovell and William McKusick, CHERYL LOVELL, Relator and WILLIAM MCKUSICK, Relator
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
United States, ex rel. Sanborn v. Athenahealth, Inc.
as 22-1246
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORDIE SANBORN and GEORDIE SANBORN, Relator
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
Lovell v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01044
Plaintiff:
Derrick J Lovell and Derrick J. Lovell
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corp, MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovell v. Howmedic Osteonics d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics et al
as 1:2017cv11862
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Lovell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics , Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02768
Defendant:
Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Surgi-Care, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Saunders, Paul Loizzo, Betsy Perez and others
Interested Party:
Willard J. Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lovell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03233
Plaintiff:
Clinton Dean Lovell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
