Civil Rights Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Kauders et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv11659
Plaintiff: Christopher P. Kauders , Lee C.S. Kauders and Hannah S. Kauders
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tringali v. Attuso, et al
as 14-1775
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEISHA TRINGALI
Defendant - Appellee: HANNAH ATTUSO, employee, Department of Revenue Child Enforcement Agency, in both her individual and official capacity, AMY PITTER, employee, Department of Revenue Child Enforcement Agency, in both her individual and official capacity, LAURIE MCGRATH, employee, Department of Revenue Child Enforcement Agency, in both her individual and official capacity and others
Tringali v. Attuso et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00124
Defendant: FNU Aniliton, Hannah Attuso, Doug Comfort and others
Plaintiff: Leisha Tringali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Czanowski et al
as 4:2012cv40118
Plaintiff: Michael Williams , Hannah Williams , N. W. and others
Defendant: John Czanowski , Joseph Wolski , Troy Valardi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11021
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Fredericks et al v. Town of West Springfield, et al
as 3:2009cv30052
Plaintiff: Theresa A. Fredericks
Defendant: Town of West Springfield,, The West Springfield Police Department, Ronald P. Campurciani and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OXLEY v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00021
Plaintiff: TINA OXLEY
Defendant: PENOBSCOT COUNTY , GLEN ROSS and HANNAH KELLEHER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?