Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Reeves et al v. Town of Hingham et al
as 1:2019cv11638
Plaintiff:
Russell Reeves and Kathryn Harrison
Defendant:
Paul K. Healey, Ted Alexiades, Town of Hingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves et al v. Town of Hingham et al
as 1:2019cv11474
Plaintiff:
Russell Reeves and Kathryn Harrison
Defendant:
Jane Does, Paul K. Healey, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves, et al v. Hingham, MA, et al
as 17-1450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL REEVES, AUSTIN REEVES and KATHERINE HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
HINGHAM, MA, TAYLOR A. B. MILLS, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police and ROBERT J. MANSFIELD, Detective
Wynn v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2016cv10190
Plaintiff:
Michael Wynn
Defendant:
Harrison Schmidt and Gregory Lennon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Josephs v. Offutt, et al
as 15-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOPHIA JOSEPHS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID OFFUTT, CLAUDE JOSEPH, KEITH HAWKINS and others
Josephs v. Offutt et al
as 1:2015cv10038
Plaintiff:
Sophia Josephs
Defendant:
David Offutt, Claude Joseph, Keith Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Reeves, et al v. Hingham, MA, et al
as 11-1298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL REEVES
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN REEVES and KATHERINE HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
HINGHAM, MA, TAYLOR MILLS, Chief of Police and ROBERT J. MANSFIELD, Detective
Reeves et al v. Hingham, Town of et al
as 1:2010cv10055
Plaintiff:
Russell Reeves, Austin Reeves and Katherine Harrison
Defendant:
Hingham, Town of, Taylor Mills, Robert J. Mansfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
