Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Maloney v. Aponte et al
as 3:2014cv30054
Plaintiff:
Owen D Maloney
Defendant:
Ronald E Aponte , Town of Belchertown, The , Board of Trustees of Clapp Memorial Library and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Noel et al v. Louis et al
as 1:2012cv11303
Plaintiff:
Barthine Noel and Arnold Noel
Defendant:
Jean Stenio Louis, Ernest Guerrier, Guerrier & Associates, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCants v. Hennigan
as 1:2012cv10738
Plaintiff:
Owen McCants
Defendant:
Maura Hennigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AZUBUKO v. EDDY et al
as 1:2012cv10182
Defendant:
Robert Eddy, Michael S. Callahan, Anthony S. Owen and others
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Owens, et al
as 11-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY OWENS, in his individual and official capacity, UNKNOWN CLERK, in her individual and official capacity, STEPHEN E. NEEL, Justice, in his individual and official capacity and others
Norcross v. City of Methuen et al
as 1:2011cv10154
Plaintiff:
Owen Norcross
Defendant:
City of Methuen , Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc. , Robert Jalbert and others
Cross_claimant:
Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc. and City of Methuen
Cross_defendant:
City of Methuen and Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Watson v. Owens et al
as 1:2011cv10095
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Watson
Defendant:
Anthony Owens, Unknown Clerk, Stephen Neel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
