Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Pendleton v. Hudson, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2014cv00365
Defendant:
Hudson, NH, Town of, Adam M. Lischinsky and Derek S. Lloyd
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Pendleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv12043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Ambra v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2011cv00600
Plaintiff:
Dennis D'Ambra
Defendant:
City of Providence, City of Providence Board of Licenses, Andrew J. Annaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011fp00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Foxboro Fisher Realty LLC
as 1:2008cv11769
Plaintiff:
Jeffery R. Smith
Defendant:
Foxboro Fisher Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Bronhard
as 1:2008cv10040
Plaintiff:
Jeffery R. Smith
Defendant:
Walter Bronhard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Mack v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Mental Health et al
as 3:2007cv30195
Plaintiff:
Harold Richard Mack
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Mental Health, Deval Patrick, Timothy P. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
