Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Dyer v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2017cv11452
Defendant:
City of Boston , Steward Health Care System LLC , Carney Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Watson v. Angelo, et al
as 16-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PROBATION OFFICER SCOTT ANGELO, in his individual and official capacity, CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER MARGUERITE RILEY, in her individual and official capacity and EDWARD DOLAN, Probation Commissioner, in his individual and official capacity
Sai v. TSA, et al
as 15-2526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAI
Defendant - Appellee:
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv14137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sai v. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) et al
as 1:2015cv13308
Plaintiff:
Sai
Defendant:
Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), United States (USA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCAMMAN et al v. SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS INC
as 2:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE SCAMMAN , THERESA CHARETTE , DOROTHY RILEY and others
Defendant:
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Watson v. Angelo et al
as 1:2015cv11283
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Watson
Defendant:
Scott Angelo, Marguerite Riley and Edward Dolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Muckle v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al
as 15-1195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL LAURENTON MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO, PREMERE ASSET SERVICES, US BANK NA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
