Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HUTCHINS et al v. BROADWAY VETERINARY CLINIC et al
as 1:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS and FOXY WOGILLS PRANCIE
Defendant:
BROADWAY VETERINARY CLINIC, BREWER VETERINARY CLINIC PA, MEADOW WOOD ANIMAL CLINIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINS v. HOUSE et al
as 1:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
KIRK R HOUSE, BRUCE A WILLIAMS, MELISSA J WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. California Pizza 5th Floor et al
as 1:2015cv14202
Plaintiff:
John Cooper
Defendant:
California Pizza 5th Floor, Boston Medical Center, Au Bon Pain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SCAMMAN et al v. SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS INC
as 2:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE SCAMMAN , THERESA CHARETTE , DOROTHY RILEY and others
Defendant:
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobs v. Davenport, et al
as 15-1735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH DAVENPORT, WESTON, MA, DONNA VANDERCLOCK and others
Defendant:
GIACALONE LEVIN
Interested Party:
MIDDLESEX DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Jacobs v. Soars, et al
as 15-1734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SOARS, DEBORAH DAVENPORT, WESTON, MA and others
Interested Party:
MIDDLESEX DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Jacobs v. Mooney, et al
as 15-1644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN MOONEY, STEVE SHAW, JOHN LYONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
