Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Padilla-Ruiz et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01393
Plaintiff:
Raul Padilla-Ruiz , Vivian J. Franceschini-Rodriguez and Conjugal Partnership Padilla-Franceschini
Defendant:
United States of America, Eric Holder, Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez and others
Cause Of Action: Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hughes-Birch, et al v. Honorable McCauley Manzi, et al
as 10-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACEY HUGHES-BIRCH
Plaintiff:
LILY HUGHES-BIRCH and LEAH KEFFERSTAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY MCCAULEY MANZI, JOHN P. CRONIN, RICHARD NARDELLA and others
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2310
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Movant - Interested Party:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2139
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Hughes-Birch et al v. Manzi et al
as 1:2009cv10302
Plaintiff:
Stacey Hughes-Birch, Lily Hughes-Birch and Leah Kefferstan
Defendant:
Mary McCauley Manzi, John P. Cronin, Richard Nardella and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Araujo, et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 08-2417
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence and URBANO PRIGNANO, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Chief of Police for the City of Providence
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its treasurer, Steven T. Napolitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Jeanty v. US, et al
as 08-2415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODZ D. JEANTY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, DENIS R. HURLEY, in his official capacity as a Judge in the Untied States District Court, Eastern District of New York, ROBERT DOLAN, in his official capacity as Chief, Veterans Benefits and Services Division in New York and others
Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al
as 08-1536
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Naplitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
