Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Huang v. Huang, et al
as 08-2233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA W. HUANG
Plaintiff:
YUN CHIOU CHENG and JOAN HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
MENG YIH HUANG, JUDGE EDWARD J. ROCKETT, HONORABLE SEAN M. DUNPHY and others
Huang v. Huang, et al
as 08-2239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA W. HUANG
Plaintiff:
YUN CHIOU CHENG and JOAN HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
MENG YIH HUANG, JUDGE EDWARD J. ROCKETT, HONORABLE SEAN M. DUNPHY and others
Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al
as 08-1536
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Naplitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Providence, RI by and through, et al
as 08-1535
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
Walden, et al v. Cicilline, Jr., et al
as 08-1534
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Napolitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Huang v. Huang, et al
as 08-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA W. HUANG
Plaintiff:
JOAN HUANG and YUN CHIOU CHENG
Defendant - Appellee:
MENG YIH HUANG, JUDGE EDWARD J. ROCKETT, HONORABLE SEAN M. DUNPHY and others
Pease et al v. Burns et al
as 3:2008cv30072
Plaintiff:
Sheryl A. Pease and Little Sprouts Day Care
Defendant:
Karen Burns, Erin Murphy Craft, Linda Lenahan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BURNS et al v. DARNELL et al
as 2:2008cv00084
Plaintiff:
GERALD C BURNS and CHRISTINE A BURNS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DARNELL , BRIAN BEAUPARLANT , CHIEF OF LEWISTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huang, et al v. Huang, et al
as 08-1270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA W. HUANG
Plaintiff:
YUN CHIOU CHENG and JOAN HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
MENG YIH HUANG, JUDGE EDWARD J. ROCKETT, HONORABLE SEAN M. DUNPHY and others
Huang, et al v. Huang, et al
as 08-1119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA W. HUANG
Plaintiff:
YUN CHIOU CHENG and JOAN HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
MENG YIH HUANG, JUDGE EDWARD J. ROCKETT, HONORABLE SEAN M. DUNPHY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
