Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Cuevas-Rodriguez v. Soto-Lopez et al
as 3:2017cv02249
Plaintiff:
Grisell Cuevas-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Julio Soto-Lopez, Jose L Perez-Mercado, Noel Torres-Roca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schand et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2015cv30148
Plaintiff:
Mark Schand, Mia Schand, Mark Schand, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Hampden County, City of Hartford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Katz v. McVeigh et al
as 1:2015cv00338
Defendant:
Maggie Bishop, Paul Boddy, Boston Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Katz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SWETT v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
PAMELA SWETT
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, BARRY DELONG, JEFFREY JACQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv11694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
MCCUE v. CITY OF BANGOR MAINE et al
as 1:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCUE
Defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR MAINE , BANGOR MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT , KIM DONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Piccone v. Dickenson et al
as 3:2013cv30147
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Piccone
Defendant:
Dickenson, Hein, Blackmere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv10722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe et al v. Briggs et al
as 3:2013cv30019
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Doe and Jorden Louis Doe
Defendant:
Amy Briggs, Barbara Cece, Lance LaPointe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Piccone v. Dickenson et al
as 3:2012cv30127
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Piccone
Defendant:
Dickenson, Hein, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
