Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2310
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Movant - Interested Party:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2139
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Koltin, et al v. Fall River Police, et al
as 08-1013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD KOLTIN, THEODORE KOLTIN and EDITH KOLTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FALL RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, FALL RIVER, MA, CHARLTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Ofume Family et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv10085
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ofume
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Governor of Massachusetts, Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Correa-Ruiz, et al v. Calderon-Serra, et al
as 06-2578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMELO CORREA-RUIZ, Former Colonel, EVELYN ROY-BONILLA, AILEEN MARIE CORREA-ROY and others
Movant:
DANIEL GARCIA and JOSE CORTES MALDONADO
Intervenor - Appellant:
ANGEL GABRIEL ROMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SILA M. CALDERON-SERRA, AGUSTIN CARTAGENA-DIAZ, VICTOR M. RIVERA-GONZALEZ and others
Allen, et al v. Rouse, et al
as 1:2000cv10981
Plaintiff:
Michael Braxton , Darryl Buchanan , Willard Clark and others
Defendant:
Richard J. Rouse , Suffolk County Sheriff's Department , Richard Feeney and others
Counter_claimant:
Richard J. Rouse , Suffolk County Sheriff's Department , Richard Feeney and others
Counter_defendant:
Darrel Allen , Kevin Bacchus , Anthony Bova and others
Movant:
Massachusetts Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
