Civil Rights Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Lewis v. NH Judicial Branch
as 11-1252
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee: NH JUDICIAL BRANCH
Watson v. Lewis, et al
as 11-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWRENCE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT LEWIS, Chief Clerk Magistrate, in his individual and official capacities, RICHARD IANELLA, Chief Register, in his individual and official capacities, JAMES GAVAGHAN, Deputy Assistant, in his individual and official capacities and others
Lewis v. NH Judicial Branch
as 11-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee: NH JUDICIAL BRANCH
Shuper v. Federal Management Co., Inc., et al
as 10-2352
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLA IOSIFOVNA SHUPER
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL MANAGEMENT CO., INC., CODMAN-PORTLAND ASSOCIATES, PETER LEWIS and others
Defendant: DANFORTH HEIGHTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11934
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Hara v. Office of Personal Management, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEAN HARA
Plaintiff: NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Defendant: HILARY CLINTON
Intervenor: LAMAR S. SMITH
Gill, et al v. Office of Personnel Management, et al
as 52-2207
Plaintiff - Appellee: NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Plaintiff: KEITH TONEY and ALBERT TONEY, III
Defendant - Appellant: OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Intervenor: LAMAR S. SMITH
Defendant: HILARY CLINTON
Gill, et al v. Office of Personal Management, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2207
Plaintiff - Appellee: NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Plaintiff: KEITH TONEY and ALBERT TONEY, III
Defendant - Appellant: OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Intervenor: LAMAR S. SMITH
Defendant: HILARY CLINTON
Mlodzinski, et al v. Lewis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1966
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS MLODZINSKI and TINA MLODZINSKI, Individually and as mother and next friend of J.M. other J. M.
Plaintiff: AMY FURMANICK
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL LEWIS, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Sergeant, TIMOTHY J. WOODWARD, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Officer, GORDON C. RAMSAY, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Officer and others
Defendant: CENTRAL NEW HAMPSHIRE SPECIAL OPERATIONS UNIT, a/k/a CNHSOU, JOHN DOES, 1-20 , Members of Central New Hampshire Special Operations Unit, in their individual and official capacities, ROBERT CORMIER, Officer, Plymouth Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others
Mlodzinski, et al v. Cormier, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1967
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS MLODZINSKI and TINA MLODZINSKI, Individually and as mother and next friend of J.M. other J. M.
Plaintiff: AMY FURMANICK
Defendant - Appellant: RICHARD ARELL, Officer, Northfield Police Department, in his individual and official capacities, CENTRAL NEW HAMPSHIRE SPECIAL OPERATIONS UNIT, a/k/a CNHSOU, ROBERT CORMIER, Officer, Plymouth Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant: JOHN DOES, 1-20 , Members of Central New Hampshire Special Operations Unit, in their individual and official capacities, STEVE HENRY, Officer, Tilton Police Department, in his individual and official capacities, BILL JOLLY, Officer, Groton Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?