Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Horgan et al v. Pentucket Regional School District et al
as 1:2014cv14733
Plaintiff:
Thomas Horgan and Janet Horgan
Defendant:
Pentucket Regional School District , Pentucket Regional High School , Jeff Mulqueen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samimi v. NAI-Plotkin/NAI-Global, et al
as 14-1990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEHZAD A. SAMIMI
Defendant - Appellee:
NAI-PLOTKIN/NAI-GLOBAL, EVAN PLOTKIN, President of NAI-Plotkin / NAI-Global, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Ngo et al V. Evans
as 1:2014cv13670
Plaintiff:
Phuong Ngo and Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc.
Defendant:
William B. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Feldman v. Woodlock et al
as 1:2014cv12279
Plaintiff:
Debra Feldman
Defendant:
Douglas P. Woodlock, News Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Evans
as 1:2014cv10864
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Defendant:
Bernadette Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv13279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv30177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv40116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
