Cases 71 - 80 of 1,048
Mukulukusso v. Doogan et al
as 4:2023cv11096
Plaintiff:
Fernando Mukulukusso
Defendant:
William E. Doogan, Karim Elhamaway, Evan Maclean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mitchell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, WILLIAM H. KELLEY and PATRICK BROWNING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
El Khoury v. Goulding, et al
as 23-1282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IMAD G. EL KHOURY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GOULDING, Police Chief, EFTHIMIOS BOUSIOS, Sergeant, WILLIAM CARLO, Detective and others
Interested Party:
MA TRIAL COURT
Smith v. Roger Williams University School of Law
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Douglas v. Suffolk County District Attorney et al
as 4:2023cv40019
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jarome Hakim Douglas
Defendant:
Suffolk County District Attorney and William A. Hinton State Laboratory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dusenberry v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2023cv10457
Plaintiff:
Jessica Dusenberry
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Bristol County District Attorney's Office, Thomas M. Quinn, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
