Cases 71 - 80 of 162
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00374
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Lath v. Dufresne, et al
as 17-1826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANJEEV LATH
Defendant - Appellee:
GERARD DUFRESNE, BETTY MULLEN and OAK BROOK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Oak Brook Associates
Defendant:
CHERYL VALLEE, PERRY VALLEE, WILLIAM QUINN MOREY and others
Interested Party:
JARED DUFRESNE, NH EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, NEW HAMPSHIRE UNION LEADER and others
Grimes v. Southern New Hampshire University
as 1:2017fp00266
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Southern New Hampshire University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. State of New Hampshire, et al
as 17-1531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, THOMAS P. VELARDI, Strafford County District Attorney, SARA B. HEUCKLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Brooks v. New Hampshire Family Court 9th Circuit et al
as 4:2017cv40049
Plaintiff:
Andrea Brooks
Defendant:
New Hampshire Family Court 9th Circuit and William Albert D'Errico, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DIMOULAS v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
ANTONIOS N DIMOULAS
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, DHHS, ROBERT M LASKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rioux v. State of New Hampshire et al
as 1:2016fp00427
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Rioux
Defendant:
State of New Hampshire and Howard Zibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
