Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Cline v. Burke, et al
as 23-1680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRON CLINE
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK K. BURKE, ANDREA LEVY, FREDERICK RUSHTON and others
DOYLE v. MAKSYMOWICZ et al
as 2:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A DOYLE
Defendant:
ANN MAKSYMOWICZ, CHARLES RUMMSEY, JONATHAN SAHRBECK, ESQ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cline v. Burke et al
as 4:2022cv40115
Plaintiff:
Tyron Cline
Defendant:
Patrick Burke, Andrea Levy, Frederick Rushton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
DOYLE v. PORTER et al
as 2:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A DOYLE
Defendant:
JEFFREY PORTER, ANN MAKSYMOWICZ, CHARLES RUMMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El Curragh et al v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv11668
Plaintiff:
Aban El Curragh, Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey, Tariff Sharif Bey and others
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Medford Massachusetts State Police, Matthew McDevitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Moorish Militia et al v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv11620
Plaintiff:
The Moorish Militia, Tarrif Sharif Bey, Jamil Rasul Bey and others
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Medford MA State Police, Matthew McDevitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF MAINE v. DOYLE
as 2:2021cv00163
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Defendant:
MICHAEL DOYLE
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Janey et al
as 1:2021cv10502
Defendant:
Wilbur E. Commodore, Raul Leon, Kim Janey and others
Plaintiff:
Olivia Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
