Civil Rights Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BARTH v. WATERBORO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00295
Defendant: MARILYN MILLER, TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB and others
Plaintiff: JOHN S BARTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PLOURDE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00532
Defendant: MAINE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff: GLEN PLOURDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11693
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv11693
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv11693
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10615
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv10615
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10526
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Opalenik et al v. Bartlett et al
as 3:2015cv30199
Plaintiff: Stephen Opalenik, Jr and Diane R Opalenik
Defendant: Adam J. Bartlett, Thomas Tudryn, William Tudryn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Foster, et al
as 15-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONNA M. CONNER
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH A. FOSTER, NH Attorney General, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MARK A. KAPPELHOFF, Acting Chief, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?