Cases 1 - 10 of 536
Galan-Olavarria v. Arenas, et al
as 24-1549
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL GALAN-OLAVARRIA
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JUSTO ARENAS, JUDGE AIDA M. DELGADO-COLON, JUDGE CAMILLE L. VELEZ-RIVE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gonzalez v. Lexington Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv10908
Plaintiff:
Tania Gonzalez and Pro se litigant Tania A Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lexington Police Department, Christopher Barry, Michael Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Pinero-Gago v. Torres-Rios et al
as 3:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Mr. Eulando Pinero-Gago
Defendant:
Mr. Alexis Torres-Rios, Mr Rafael Riviere-Vazquez, Mr. Marcos Concepcion-Tirado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lockley v. Cotto-Davila et al
as 3:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
Tamieka Lashawn Lockley
Defendant:
Orlando Cotto-Davila, Ileana Cruz-Velazquez, Juan Carlos Vera-Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
