Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Klunder v. Brown University, et al
as 13-1769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE KLUNDER
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWN UNIVERSITY, RUTH SIMMONS, in her individual and official capacities, CARLA HANSEN, in her individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
ROBERT ENOS, in his individual and official capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turkowitz et al v. Town of Provincetown et al
as 1:2010cv10634
Plaintiff:
Barry Scott Turkowitz and Bryan Richardson
Defendant:
Town of Provincetown, Warren Tobias, Jeff Jaran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2310
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Movant - Interested Party:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2139
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Assad et al v. Collanino et al
as 1:2009cv10554
Plaintiff:
Stephen Assad, Marguerita Bova and Tyler Assad
Defendant:
Collanino, Brian Chapman, Daniel Clemens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
