Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Aboussa et al v. NH State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ekoue Dodji Aboussa and Images Des Reves Photography
Defendant:
NH State Police, US Federal Bureau of Investigation and Concord Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Bey v. The United States of America Federal Government
as 1:2024cv10708
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anu Bey
Defendant:
The United States of America Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carter v. Federal Police
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jason Carter
Defendant:
Federal Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howell v. Brookline Bancorp Building Staff and Presidents, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Howell v. Cambridge Public Library, et al
as 24-1139
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY, Thomas O'Neil Branch, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, MJ MCFADDEN, SCOTT KELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv13156
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Department of Justice, IRS, FCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howell v. Cambridge Public Library et al
as 1:2023cv13136
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Cambridge Public Library, Cambridge Police Department, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
