Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Cotto-Colon v. DeJoy
as 3:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
Mr JANICE COTTO-COLON and Janice Cotto-Colon
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Beaudoin v. Baker, et al
as 23-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN PAUL BEAUDOIN, JR. and JOHN PAUL BEAUDOIN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., MAURA TRACY HEALEY, in her official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MARGARET R. COOKE, individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Public Health of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Laura v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2023cv40129
Plaintiff:
Quantreil Laura
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Jeffrey Conroy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Beaudoin, Sr. v. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv11356
Plaintiff:
John Paul Beaudoin, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker, Margaret R. Cooke, Mindy Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
